SEAS CAMPAIGN LINKS PAGE
SASES - Substations Action Save East Suffolk - http://sases.org.uk/
SoS - Save Our Sandlings - https://www.saveoursandlings.org.uk/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/NectonsubstationAction/ - For Necton and all Vattenfallaffected villages between here and Happisburgh – this i s a private group so need to contact email@example.com for invitation to join)
https://www.facebook.com/groups/154155941795483/ – For all people affected by Vattenfall (and other) landfalls at Happisburgh – open group
https://www.facebook.com/N2RSgroup/ – helpful for all people affected by possible relay stations if their village is threatened by any offshore windfarms.
https://friendsofnorthnorfolk.org/ Friends of North Norfolk.
http://www.cprenorfolk.org.uk/ - CPRE Norfolk (Campaign for the Protection of Rural England)
Looking at the existing regimes, questions have arisen regarding the suitability of the current regulatory regime for offshore wind. It is currently heavily concentrated on competitiveness, which is considered beneficial for consumers. That means that currently there is no sharing of infrastructure, and each wind farm has an individual connection to transmit the power that it generates. There are three material concerns with this: it is financially inefficient; it has a negative environmental impact; it may have a negative impact on coastal communities where connections make landfall.
Eight Offshore Wind Energy Projects are widely believed to be planned to connect to the National Grid at Friston (this does not include future windfarm projects as a result of the seabed leases awarded by the Crown Estate in relation to the Round 4 process). Cumulative impact means eight substations and interconnectors constructed sequentially or consecutively. Plus, the addition of a nuclear power station, one of the largest in the world. This will be the largest complex of energy infrastructure in the U.K. situated in one of the most fragile ecosystems in the U.K. These are judged to be ill-conceived plans where the process of choosing the site for the mega infrastructure hub is shown to be flawed. There are a number of better alternative brownfield sites for this designated vast complex.