3 August 2020
By Email Only:
The Rt. Hon. Kwasi Kwarteng
Minister for Business, Energy and Clean Growth
Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy
1 Victoria Street
OFFSHORE TRANSMISSION NETWORK REVIEW (“REVIEW”)
SASES and SEAS are two groups of East Suffolk residents which have been seeking to find a more sustainable way for offshore energy to be brought onshore and connect to the National Grid. As you are aware East Suffolk is overburdened with energy projects with eight offshore projects planned for our area together with the proposed development of Sizewell C, all of which will involve development in the Suffolk Coasts and Heaths AONB. In addition other parts of the UK, most notably Norfolk, have similar issues with the onshore impacts of offshore energy. Accordingly we were delighted to learn of the “Offshore Transmission Network Review” and we have carefully reviewed the Terms of Reference (“TOR”).
We strongly endorse the view that offshore green energy is a good thing. We also share the view that the onshore connections of offshore developments must not cause considerable irreparable damage to coastal communities and the environment, which is the present position in the absence of any overarching, holistic, approach.
We are of course confident that this Review is intended to be a serious exercise and not one
designed to push the concerns of those whose communities and lives are badly affected by onshore connections into the long not so “green” grass.
In these circumstances we note that the TOR does not set out any details of the way in which the Review is to take place save to say that it will “be led by the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS) with support from a range of government and Industry bodies and an industry expert group.” It also refers to future consultations.
You will appreciate that representatives from outside of the industry and sector will wish to be satisfied that the Review group is objective and independent and not dominated by industry representatives whose interests will be at odds with those of onshore communities.
Could you please assist in answering the following questions.
1. When the TOR was being drafted did BEIS consult with the industry? If so why did it not consult also with representatives of onshore communities?
2. Who is to lead the Review?
3. Will that person be independent of industry, and if not why not?
4. How large will the Review team be?
5. What range of specialist qualifications will the Review team have?
6. What powers will the Review team have to call for evidence or verify the accuracy and objectivity of submissions provided to them?
7. The TOR refers to the group including “Industry” bodies and an “Industry” expert group. Why does the membership not include representatives of onshore communities?
8. How will you ensure that these “industry” groups do not dominate the agenda and serve their own commercial interests?
9. Why are the TOR drafted to exclude projects where connection is to occur before 2026? This substantial exclusion seems to be explicitly designed to enable existing projects to be waved through irrespective of the damage that they might cause to local, onshore, environments and communities. Over the next few years huge damage to onshore communities could be caused by existing plans.
10. The issue being reviewed is one of real complexity - what is the time scale anticipated for a report? The TOR refers to an “update by the end of the year, with a view to providing clarity for an enduring approach in 2021”. What is meant by this?
11. If “clarity” is sought in 2021 does this assume that the entire Review will be completed relatively early in 2021? If so, how can the Review team ensure thoroughness?
12. Can you please confirm that the Secretary of State will, when taking decisions about current DCO applications, which using the terminology in the TOR “connect to the onshore network” , take the conclusions of the Review into account in addressing any recommendations from the relevant Examining Authorities.
We look forward to hearing from you.
M: 07788 870823
cc Therese Coffey MP, George Freeman MP
Suffolk County Council - Matthew Hicks, Richard Rout, Andrew Reid
East Suffolk Council - Steve Gallant, Craig Rivett, James Mallinder, Jocelyn Bond
Therese Coffey says proposals for a huge 30-acre electricity substation at Friston and the associated cabling corridor from Thorpeness for two new windfarms, if approved, would have a "devastating impact" on the area including elements of the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
This complaint letter, made on behalf of Suffolk Energy Action Solutions, concerns efforts being made by Scottish Power Renewables (SPR) to prevent persons who would otherwise have a reason to object and provide support to groups opposing SPR’s application in respect of EA1N and EA2, from opposing the application for consent. The nub of the complaint concerns the fact that in the course of concluding agreements with landowners, SPR is including a clause which makes agreement conditional upon the individual landowner concerned not opposing the application and withdrawing any evidence already given.
The seven closest town and parish councils likely to suffer the brunt of the disruption and chaos from the onshore development of Scottish Powers EA1N & EA2 wind farms have sent a joint letter to Steve Gallant leader at East Suffolk District Council. The letter expresses surprise and disappointment at the councils unexpected about face from an ‘object’ position to a ‘neutral’ position