LionLink (formerly Eurolink)
What is LionLink?
LionLink is a proposed High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) connection between Holland and Suffolk, a joint project between Dutch TenneT (the Dutch Transmission System Operator) and the developer National Grid Ventures (NGV) a non-regulated, for profit company. It is an interconnector cable that will allow for exchange of energy between the UK and Holland, however whereas at the Dutch end wind-farms are connected to their MPI (Multi-Purpose Interconnector platform) to pool the energy offshore, at the UK end there is no offshore integration, with no wind-farms currently planned to connect. This is therefore simply a way for NGV to sell energy for profit when market supply and demand conditions allow for it. See a simple diagram of the Dutch and UK ends of the interconnector HERE
On 6 March 2024 National Grid revealed the preferred landfall sites and cabling routes for the LionLink interconnector between Holland and the UK, with proposed landfall at Southwold or Walberswick. You can read LionLink’s Supplementary Non-Statutory Consultation Report HERE
This makes it more likely that Sea Link an HVDC cable between Suffolk and Kent, will come onshore between Aldeburgh and Thorpeness. SEAS understanding is that Aldeburgh North Warren has been chosen for SEALINK and TWO other schemes. They can only squeeze in two or three M11 width cable trenches through NORTH WARREN RSPB, hence they have to find an additional landfall site further north for LionLink.
SEE the current CUMULATIVE IMPACT MAP of planned landfalls and cable tunnel corridors HERE
READ the BBC’s article on the LionLink announcement HERE and an ITV summary with useful maps of just some of the many projects due to have a devastating impact on the Suffolk Coast HERE
SEAS continues on TV, Radio and in the Press to challenge these plans, WATCH our appearance on ITV Anglia on 6 March HERE
READ the arguments against current plans in SEAS Response to the LionLink Supplementary Non-Statutory Public Consultation HERE
SEAS has been promoting a better solution, pooling energy offshore and taking power with subsea cables closer to where it will be used, coming onshore at an existing brownfield site – see our Pilot Tests proposal
These are the wrong plans in the wrong places!
SEAS analysed LionLink’s massive Environmental Impact Scoping Report, and sent its formal response objecting on four counts:
1) Roads and Traffic
2) Tourism and Hospitality
3) Coastal erosion and Geology
4) Biodiversity and Ecology
READ the SEAS Response to the LionLink EIA Scoping Document
Further Information:
Website: https://www.nationalgrid.com/national-grid-ventures/future-developments/lionlink
Email: info@eurolink.nationalgrid.com
ARCHIVE:
SEAS Response to NGV’s First Public Consultation
The first non-statutory LionLink public consultation document is here.
See the LionLink virtual exhibition and project maps here – scroll down to ‘Virtual exhibition and downloadable resources’.
EuroLink Interconnector Timeline
What SEAS say about EuroLink Interconnector
EuroLink Interconnector Key Documents
EuroLink Interconnector in the Press
Cumulative Impact - SEAS Submissions into the EA1N/2 Examination
- SEAS Submission Final Submission Re: Cumulative Impact, 6 October 2021
- SEAS Supplementary Submission on Cumulative Impact Deadline 13 – 5 July 2021
- Cumulative Impact, Evidence from National Grid, SEAS Deadline 11 Submission
- Cumulative Impact, SEAS Deadline 9 Submission
- Cumulative impact, SEAS Deadline 8 Submission
- Norfolk Vanguard and cumulative impact, SEAS Deadline 6 Submission
- Cumulative Impact, SEAS Deadline 5 and Deadline 1 Submission
- Cumulative Impact, SEAS Deadline 4 Submission
- Cumulative impact, SEAS Deadline 3 Submission
- Cumulative impact, SEAS Deadline 2 Submission
- NGESO and NGETS, Deadline 2 Submission
The Way Forward - A Split Decision
- The offshore turbines are recommended for consent.
- The onshore infrastructure is rejected in favour of full consideration of better locations for this infrastructure where the adverse impacts are minimised at a brownfield or industrialised site.
Campaigners call for ‘split decision’ over Suffolk windfarm projects, East Anglian Daily Times, 19 July 2021
SEAS Further submission with regard to a ‘split decision,’ A ‘Split Decision’- A Positive Way Forward, 5 July 2021
SEAS Submission to the Planning Inspectorate Re: The ‘Split Decision’ February 2021
Therese Coffey MP campaigns for a ‘Split Decision’ and to reject the Friston Substation site February 2021
The Way Forward - Offshore Integration
The benefits of an integrated offshore transmission network far outweigh any benefit gained from continuing with a radial transmission system.
Key Documents
Crossed Wires: Maintaining public support for offshore wind farms, Policy Exchange, July 2021
The Offshore Co-ordination Phase 1 Final Report, NGESO, 16 December 2020, NGESO: “Adopting an integrated approach for all offshore projects to be delivered from 2025 has the potential to save consumers approximately £6 billion, or 18% in capital and operating expenditure between now and 2050”. Importantly, footnote 5 states, “This means applying an integrated approach to all offshore projects that have not yet received consent”.
Energy White Paper, Powering our Net Zero Future, December 2020
On 6 November 2020, in response to Mr Duncan Baker’s adjournment debate, the then Energy Minister, and now the newly appointed Secretary of State for the Department of Business Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), Mr Kwarteng, made a very encouraging response and said, amongst other things:
- The offshore wind industry had evolved since 2015;
- There was a shift in the industry towards integration.
- Point to point transmission was recognised as having severe detrimental impacts onshore
- Technology was available to build an offshore integrated network
- Industry was engaged through the OTNR
- The argument for some form of offshore network has been won
In July 2020 the Department of Business Energy and Industrial Strategy announced a major Review, the Offshore Transmission Network Review to address the barriers it presents to further significant development of offshore wind, with a view to achieving net zero.
The findings of the Integrated Offshore Transmission Project (East) 2015 Report concluded that an integrated offshore solution was in the interests of the UK as a whole.
It is illogical for further radial connections to the grid to be approved. The acutely detrimental impacts of radial connections must now be properly recognised in the Planning Balance.
What is a 'MOG'? Is it the answer?, SEAS, June 2020
In the Press
UK
UK National Grid in talks to build an energy island in the North Sea, New Scientist, 11 October 2021
'Money can't compensate' for disruption caused by offshore wind, campaigners say, EADT July 2021
Prime Minister says coast could be the 'Riyadh of offshore wind' in PMQs, EasternDaily Press, 24 February 20021
U.K. Power Grid Moving Offshore to Support $27 Billion Wind Boom, Bloomberg, December 2020
Outdated regulation is slowing investment in onshore electricity grid, The Guardian, 1 November 2020
Offshore Wind in UK – Roadmap Required, Offshore Wind, October 26 2020
Change the way offshore wind farms connect and save billions - report finds, Eastern Daily Press, September 20 2020
Offshore wind blows hole in case for National Grid electricity role, The Times, October 8 2020
Modular Offshore Grid (MOG) - Can these ideas stop the countryside being dug up? Eastern Daily Press, June 27 2020
Norfolk MPs lobby Kwasi Kwarteng, Energy Minister at BEIS, SASES, 11 June 2020
Greenpeace suggests taking a more 'strategic approach' to offshore wind grid infrastructure, including increasing the number of grid connections to land shared between several projects, ReNEWS.BIZ, June 4 2020
Offshore Ring Main (ORM) feasibility study announced after Norfolk MPs met with Energy Minister Kwasi Kwarteng to discuss their concerns, Eastern Daily Press, June 2 2020
NORTH SEA INTEGRATION
North Sea EU countries step up plans to harness wind power, Financial Times, 20 May 2022
Plans for Offshore Wind-to-Green Hydrogen Energy Islands in Germany and Denmark Offshorewind.biz, 20 May 2022
Denmark maps seas for future offshore wind farms and energy islands, Recharge, June 8 2020
Denmark confirms massive wind plans for 'world's first energy islands' in North Sea and Baltic , Recharge May 20 2020
Denmark eyes 10GW offshore wind 'islands' in $45bn plan, Recharge, December 2019
North Seas ministers seek rules for meshed offshore wind grid, Recharge, December 4 2019
The USA
Growing chorus’ endorses multi-user transmission system, Riviera May 2020
Multi-user US offshore grid could 'save $1bn' ReNEWS.Biz, May 2020
Report Finds $1B in Grid Upgrade Savings, Other Benefits in Planned Transmission Approach to Offshore Wind, Yahoo Finance, May 2020
Campaign With Us
We are asking you to write, to the Secretary of State for the Department of Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ), see full details HERE